4.4 Article

Simultaneous Determination of Fluorine, Chlorine, Bromine and Iodine in Six Geochemical Reference Materials Using Pyrohydrolysis, Ion Chromatography and Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry

期刊

GEOSTANDARDS AND GEOANALYTICAL RESEARCH
卷 33, 期 4, 页码 477-485

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-908X.2009.00018.x

关键词

halogens; pyrohydrolysis; ion chromatography; inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry; rock reference material; halogenes; pyrohydrolyse; chromatographie ionique; spectrometrie de masse couplee une source de plasma induit; materiaux geologiques de reference

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Concentrations of halogens (fluorine, chlorine, bromine and iodine) were determined in six geochemical reference materials (BHVO-2, GS-N, JG-1, JR-1, JB-1b, JB-2). Halogens were first extracted from powdered samples using a pyrohydrolysis technique, then hydrolysis solutions were analysed by ion chromatography for F and Cl and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry for Br and I. The detection limits in solutions were 100 mu g l-1 for both F and Cl and 10 ng l-1 for Br and I. Considering the extraction procedure, performed on a maximum of 500 mg of sample and producing 100 ml of pyrohydrolysis solution, detection limits in rock samples were 20 mg kg-1 for F and Cl and 2 mu g kg-1 for Br and I. The mean analytical errors on the studied composition ranges were estimated at 10 mg kg-1 for F and Cl, 100 mu g kg-1 for Br and 25 mu g kg-1 for I. The concentration values, based on repeated (generally > 10) sample analysis, were in good agreement generally with published values and narrowed the mean dispersion around mean values. Large dispersions are discussed in terms of samples heterogeneity and contaminations during sample preparation. Basaltic RMs were found to be more suitable for studies of halogen compositions than differentiated rock material, especially granites - the powders of which were heterogeneous in halogens at the 500 mg level.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据