4.2 Article

Depositional and diagenetic controls on the reservoir quality of Upper Triassic Chang-7 tight oil sandstones, southwestern Ordos basin, China

期刊

GEOSCIENCES JOURNAL
卷 23, 期 3, 页码 471-488

出版社

GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY KOREA
DOI: 10.1007/s12303-018-0042-z

关键词

Ordos basin; depositional facies; diagenesis; reservoir quality; tight oil sandstones

资金

  1. National Science and Technology Major Project [2016ZX05002004-011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The seventh oil layer of the Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation (Chang-7) tight oil sandstone reservoirs is a major exploration target. A significant amount of hydrocarbons has been discovered in these reservoirs in the southwestern Ordos basin in China. The Chang-7 tight sandstones are characterised as tight with low porosity, low permeability, and strong heterogeneity. This study investigates the sedimentary facies, diagenesis, and their impact on the reservoir quality of the Chang-7 tight oil sandstones. The sandstones were deposited in a deltaic-lacustrine depositional system. Three major depositional facies are identified consisting of delta front fed by braided rivers and meandering rivers, and slump turbidite fans. The depositional environment exerts a key control on reservoir quality. The distinct low-energy sedimentary environment produced fine to very fine-grained sandstones with high matrix and mica contents, characterised by low initial porosity and permeability. Diagenesis mainly comprised mechanical compaction and cementation by quartz, carbonate minerals and various clay minerals. The reservoir properties of the Chang-7 sandstones are generally poor, with porosity of 1.4-20.7% (average porosity 8.6%) and permeability of 0.001-116.7 mD (average 0.2 mD), which are attributed to significant compaction and cementation. Mechanical compaction was more important than cementation for reducing porosity, whereas secondary dissolution porosity was significant for the Chang-7 tight oil sandstones due to closer proximity to the underlying Chang-7(3) source rocks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据