4.6 Article

Detection of subsurface soil cracks by vertical anisotropy profiles of apparent electrical resistivity

期刊

GEOPHYSICS
卷 75, 期 4, 页码 WA85-WA93

出版社

SOC EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICISTS
DOI: 10.1190/1.3474590

关键词

-

资金

  1. Cotton Catchment Community CRC
  2. Cotton Research and Development Cooperation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To date, an understanding of crack dynamics has been fundamentally hampered by the lack of available techniques to observe or monitor crack dynamics below the soil surface. A new technique relates the growth of soil cracks to a progressive increase in the electrical anisotropy of the soil. Although a single measurement of anisotropy is possible using a surface array of electrodes, the use of four strings of electrodes installed vertically at the corners of a square provides a valuable picture of the crack pattern at depth. In addition, time-lapse electrical surveys allow the growth of cracks to be clearly monitored. The electrical anisotropy is defined as the ratio of the alpha-to-beta apparent resistivity for the square array and is determined for each coplanar set of four electrodes using one electrode from each of the four vertical strings. In a laboratory, we measured the electrical anisotropy in a sand-filled lysimeter with a plastic sheet, introduced to represent an electrically insulating crack. Measurements were then repeated in a cracking-soil-filled lysimeter. Finally, measurements were made in a field where a flood-irrigated sorghum crop was grown on cracking soil. Measurements under all three conditions demonstrate that the lateral and vertical extents of cracking in a soil profile strongly influence the electrical anisotropy. The larger the cumulative cracking volume, the higher the electrical anisotropy. Soil-moisture changes after crack closure have a minor influence on the measured anisotropy, as have sorghum roots. These experiments demonstrate that electrical-anisotropy profiles are a valuable tool for monitoring crack dynamics within a soil profile.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据