4.7 Article

Carbon cycle extremes during the 21st century in CMIP 5 models: Future evolution and attribution to climatic drivers

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 41, 期 24, 页码 8853-8861

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2014GL062409

关键词

extreme events; CMIP5; carbon cycle

资金

  1. project GEOCARBON of the European Community [283080]
  2. Regional and Global Climate Modeling (RGCM) Program in the Climate and Environmental Sciences Division (CESD) of the Biological and Environmental Research (BER) Program in the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science
  3. Directorate For Geosciences [1048890] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences [1048890] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Climate extremes such as droughts and heat waves affect terrestrial ecosystems and may alter local carbon budgets. However, it still remains uncertain to what degree extreme impacts in the carbon cycle influence the carbon cycle-climate feedback both today and the near future. Here we analyze spatiotemporally contiguous negative extreme anomalies in gross primary production (GPP) and net ecosystem production (NEP) in model output of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) ensemble and investigate their future development and attribution to climatic drivers. We find that relative to the overall increase in global carbon uptake, negative extremes in GPP and NEP lose importance toward the end of the 21st century. This effect can be related to elevated CO2 concentrations and higher amounts of available water at the global scale, partially mitigating the impacts of droughts and heat waves, respectively. Overall, based on CMIP5 models, we hypothesize that terrestrial ecosystems might be more resilient against future climate extremes than previously thought. Future work will have to further scrutinize these results considering that various biological and biogeochemical feedbacks are not yet integrated within Earth system models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据