4.7 Article

Impact of atmospheric nitrogen deposition on phytoplankton productivity in the South China Sea

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 41, 期 9, 页码 3156-3162

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2014GL059665

关键词

-

资金

  1. ICSU Scientific Committee on Oceanic Research
  2. U.S. National Science Foundation
  3. Global Atmosphere Watch
  4. World Weather Research Programme of the World Meteorological Organization
  5. International Maritime Organization
  6. University of East Anglia
  7. Texas A&M University Institute for Advanced Studies
  8. Midcareer Researcher Program [2012R1A2A1A01004631]
  9. Basic Science Research Program [2012R1A6A3A04038883]
  10. Global Research Project - National Research Foundation of Korea
  11. Long-term change of structure and function in marine ecosystems of Korea
  12. Management of marine organisms causing ecological disturbance and harmful effects - Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries of South Korea
  13. Directorate For Geosciences
  14. Division Of Ocean Sciences [1243377] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The impacts of anthropogenic nitrogen (N) deposition on the marine N cycle are only now being revealed, but the magnitudes of those impacts are largely unknown in time and space. The South China Sea (SCS) is particularly subject to high anthropogenic N deposition, because the adjacent countries are highly populated and have rapidly growing economies. Analysis of data sets for atmospheric N deposition, satellite chlorophyll-a (Chl-a), and air mass back trajectories reveals that the transport of N originating from the populated east coasts of China and Indonesia, and its deposition to the ocean, has been responsible for the enhancements of Chl-a in the SCS. We found that atmospheric N deposition contributed approximately 20% of the annual biological new production in the SCS. The airborne contribution of N to new production in the SCS is expected to grow considerably in the coming decades.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据