4.7 Article

Local spring warming drives earlier river- ice breakup in a large Arctic delta

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 41, 期 5, 页码 1560-1566

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2013GL058761

关键词

Arctic rivers; climatic change; Arctic snowfall; river biogeochemistry; river ice; river-ocean interface

资金

  1. International Polar Year-Canadian Federal Program
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council
  3. Natural Resources Canada (Office of Energy Research and Development, Geological Survey of Canada, Polar Continental Shelf Project)
  4. Environment Canada
  5. Northern Scientific Training Program Canada
  6. Aurora Research Institute
  7. ArcticNet
  8. Networks of Centres of Excellence Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pan-Arctic rivers strongly affect the Arctic Ocean and their vast lake-rich deltas. Their discharges may be increasing because of an intensifying hydrological cycle driven by warming climate. We show that a previously unexplained trend toward earlier ice breakup in the Mackenzie River Delta is little affected by winter warming during the period of river-ice growth and is unaffected by river discharge, but unexpectedly is strongly related to local spring warming during the period of river-ice melt. These results are statistically linked to declining winter snowfall that was not expected because of an intensifying Arctic hydrological cycle. Earlier ice breakup is expected to cause declining water level peaks that will reduce off-channel flows through the lake-rich delta before river waters enter the ocean. Thus, local spring warming with unexpected snowfall declines, rather than warmer winters, can drive earlier ice breakup in large Arctic rivers and biogeochemical changes in their river-ocean interface. Key Points Earlier ice breakup in a large Arctic river is driven by spring warming trend Earlier breakup is not affected by winter warming or changes in river discharge Spring warming effect on river breakup is amplified by declining winter snowfall

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据