4.7 Article

Enhanced transfer of terrestrially derived carbon to the atmosphere in a flooding event

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 40, 期 1, 页码 116-122

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2012GL054145

关键词

-

资金

  1. NASA [NNX08AW98G]
  2. USGS National Stream Quality Accounting Network
  3. NASA [92785, NNX08AW98G] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rising CO2 concentration in the atmosphere, global climate change, and the sustainability of the Earth's biosphere are great societal concerns for the 21st century. Global climate change has, in part, resulted in a higher frequency of flooding events, which allow for greater exchange between soil/plant litter and aquatic carbon pools. Here we demonstrate that the summer 2011 flood in the Mississippi River basin, caused by extreme precipitation events, resulted in a flushing of terrestrially derived dissolved organic carbon (TDOC) to the northern Gulf of Mexico. Data from the lower Atchafalaya and Mississippi rivers showed that the DOC flux to the northern Gulf of Mexico during this flood was significantly higher than in previous years. We also show that consumption of radiocarbon-modern TDOC by bacteria in floodwaters in the lower Atchafalaya River and along the adjacent shelf contributed to northern Gulf shelf waters changing from a net sink to a net source of CO2 to the atmosphere in June and August 2011. This work shows that enhanced flooding, which may or may not be caused by climate change, can result in rapid losses of stored carbon in soils to the atmosphere via processes in aquatic ecosystems. Citation: Bianchi, T. S., F. Garcia-Tigreros, S. A. Yvon-Lewis, M. Shields, H. J. Mills, D. Butman, C. Osburn, P. Raymond, G. C. Shank, S. F. DiMarco, N. Walker, B. K. Reese, R. Mullins-Perry, A. Quigg, G. R. Aiken, and E. L. Grossman (2013), Enhanced transfer of terrestrially derived carbon to the atmosphere in a flooding event, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 116-122, doi: 10.1029/2012GL054145.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据