4.7 Article

Tropical cyclone and extreme rainfall trends in East Asian summer monsoon since mid-20th century

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 39, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2012GL052945

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Council, Taipei, Taiwan [NSC 100-2811-M-002-149]
  2. U. S. Naval Postgraduate School
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences
  4. China Meteorological Administration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Proper interpretations of extreme rainfall trends in the Asian monsoon regions are complicated by tropical cyclones (TCs) from tropical oceans, whose rainfall trend may be different from the local monsoon (non-TC) rain. Here we show that the trends over the China summer monsoon region have been distorted by western North Pacific typhoons, which bring rainfall with decreasing frequency and increasing intensity. Typically the latter is not sufficient to overcome the former, so TC-related extreme rainfall trend is smaller than monsoon-related extreme rainfall. The net impact underestimates the increasing trend and overestimates the decreasing trend in monsoon extreme rainfall over most areas. The effect is minimal in the Meiyu rain belt region, but reaches 30% in northeastern and southern China. The largest distortions occur on offshore islands in the main TC paths that underwent significant decadal variations. In Hainan, the -3%/decade trend becomes +7%/decade if typhoon rainfall is removed. An opposite case occurs in Taiwan, where the extreme rainfall trend is hugely inflated by local increases in TC rainfall. These opposite effects emphasize the importance of considering the different mechanisms of rainfall systems in order to avoid mis-attribution of regional effects on extreme rainfall to thermodynamic consequences of global warming. Citation: Chang, C.-P., Y. Lei, C.-H. Sui, X. Lin, and F. Ren (2012), Tropical cyclone and extreme rainfall trends in East Asian summer monsoon since mid-20th century, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L18702, doi:10.1029/2012GL052945.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据