4.7 Article

Significant changes to ENSO strength and impacts in the twenty-first century: Results from CMIP5

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 39, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2012GL052759

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Changes to the El Nino/Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and its atmospheric teleconnections under climate change are investigated using simulations conducted for the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5). The overall response to CO2 increases is determined using 27 models, and the ENSO amplitude change based on the multi-model mean is indistinguishable from zero. However, changes between ensembles run with a given model are sometimes significant: for four of the eleven models having ensemble sizes larger than three, the 21st century change to ENSO amplitude is statistically significant. In these four models, changes to SST and wind stress do not differ substantially from those in the models with no ENSO response, indicating that mean changes are not predictive of the ENSO sensitivity to climate change. Also, ocean vertical stratification is less (more) sensitive to CO2 in models where ENSO strengthens (weakens), likely due to a regulation of the subsurface temperature structure by ENSO-related poleward heat transport. Atmospheric teleconnections also show differences between models where ENSO amplitude does and does not respond to climate change; in the former case El Nino/La Nina-related sea level pressure anomalies strengthen with CO2, and in the latter they weaken and shift polewards and cast-wards. These results illustrate the need for large ensembles to isolate significant ENSO climate change responses, and for future work on diagnosing the dynamical causes of inter-model teleconnection differences. Citation: Stevenson, S. L. (2012), Significant changes to ENSO strength and impacts in the twenty-first century: Results from CMIP5, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L17703, doi:10.1029/2012GL052759.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据