4.7 Article

Acceleration of the contribution of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets to sea level rise

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 38, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2011GL046583

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  2. National Science Foundation
  3. Utrecht University
  4. Netherlands Polar Programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ice sheet mass balance estimates have improved substantially in recent years using a variety of techniques, over different time periods, and at various levels of spatial detail. Considerable disparity remains between these estimates due to the inherent uncertainties of each method, the lack of detailed comparison between independent estimates, and the effect of temporal modulations in ice sheet surface mass balance. Here, we present a consistent record of mass balance for the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets over the past two decades, validated by the comparison of two independent techniques over the last 8 years: one differencing perimeter loss from net accumulation, and one using a dense time series of time-variable gravity. We find excellent agreement between the two techniques for absolute mass loss and acceleration of mass loss. In 2006, the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets experienced a combined mass loss of 475 +/- 158 Gt/yr, equivalent to 1.3 +/- 0.4 mm/yr sea level rise. Notably, the acceleration in ice sheet loss over the last 18 years was 21.9 +/- 1 Gt/yr(2) for Greenland and 14.5 +/- 2 Gt/yr(2) for Antarctica, for a combined total of 36.3 +/- 2 Gt/yr(2). This acceleration is 3 times larger than for mountain glaciers and ice caps (12 +/- 6 Gt/yr(2)). If this trend continues, ice sheets will be the dominant contributor to sea level rise in the 21st century. Citation: Rignot, E., I. Velicogna, M. R. van den Broeke, A. Monaghan, and J. Lenaerts (2011), Acceleration of the contribution of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets to sea level rise, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L05503, doi:10.1029/2011GL046583.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据