4.7 Article

Arctic methane sources: Isotopic evidence for atmospheric inputs

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 38, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2011GL049319

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Environment Research Council
  2. Royal Holloway
  3. EU [FP6-2005-Global-4-036677]
  4. Meth-MonitEUr project [FP5]
  5. earlier INTAS projects
  6. ARCFAC V [02619-2007-67, 02619-2008-69]
  7. COST Action [ES0902]
  8. NERC [NE/I028874/1, NE/I014683/1, NE/I029161/1, NE/D005728/2, noc010011, NE/F020937/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/F020937/1, NE/D005728/2, NE/I014683/1, NE/I029161/1, NE/I028874/1, noc010011] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By comparison of the methane mixing ratio and the carbon isotope ratio (delta C-13(CH4)) in Arctic air with regional background, the incremental input of CH4 in an air parcel and the source delta C-13(CH4) signature can be determined. Using this technique the bulk Arctic CH4 source signature of air arriving at Spitsbergen in late summer 2008 and 2009 was found to be -68 parts per thousand, indicative of the dominance of a biogenic CH4 source. This is close to the source signature of CH4 emissions from boreal wetlands. In spring, when wetland was frozen, the CH4 source signature was more enriched in C-13 at -53 +/- 6 parts per thousand with air mass back trajectories indicating a large influence from gas field emissions in the Ob River region. Emissions of CH4 to the water column from the seabed on the Spitsbergen continental slope are occurring but none has yet been detected reaching the atmosphere. The measurements illustrate the significance of wetland emissions. Potentially, these may respond quickly and powerfully to meteorological variations and to sustained climate warming. Citation: Fisher, R. E., et al. (2011), Arctic methane sources: Isotopic evidence for atmospheric inputs, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L21803, doi:10.1029/2011GL049319.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据