4.7 Article

Temperature dependence of global precipitation extremes

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 36, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2009GL040218

关键词

-

资金

  1. Thematic Research Proposal to Academia Sinica entitled Heat Island Effect over Taiwan's Western Plain and Its Impacts on Climate Changes'' [NSC 96-2111-M-001-005-MY3, NSC 96-2752-M-001-006-PAE]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Data from the Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) covering the period 1979-2007 are examined for changes of precipitation extremes as a function of global mean temperature by using a new method which focuses on interannual differences rather than time series. We find that the top 10% bin of precipitation intensity increases by about 95% for each degree Kelvin (K) increase in global mean temperature, while 30%-60% bins decrease by about 20% K-1. The global average precipitation intensity increases by about 23% K-1, substantially greater than the increase of about 7% K-1 in atmospheric water-holding capacity estimated by the Clausius-Clapeyron equation. The large increase of precipitation intensity is qualitatively consistent with the hypothesis that the precipitation intensity should increase by more than 7% K-1 because of the additional latent heat released from the increased moisture. Our results also provide an independent evidence in support for significant increases in the number and/or size of strong global tropical cyclones. However an ensemble of 17 latest generation climate models estimates an increase of only about 2% K-1 in precipitation intensity, about one order of magnitude smaller than our value, suggesting that the risk of extreme precipitation events due to global warming is substantially greater than that estimated by the climate models. Citation: Liu, S. C., C. Fu, C.-J. Shiu, J.-P. Chen, and F. Wu (2009), Temperature dependence of global precipitation extremes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L17702, doi:10.1029/2009GL040218.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据