4.7 Article

Stratospheric influence on circulation changes in the Southern Hemisphere troposphere in coupled climate models

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 35, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2008GL035354

关键词

-

资金

  1. NERC [NE/E006787/1]
  2. Defra and MoD Integrated Climate Programme [GA01101, CBC/2B/0417_Annex C5]
  3. Leverhulme Trust
  4. Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison (PCMDI)
  5. WCRP's Working Group on Coupled Modelling (WGCM)
  6. Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy
  7. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/E006787/1, bas010014] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. NERC [NE/E006787/1, bas010014] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The recent intensification of the circumpolar circulation in the SH troposphere in summer and autumn has been attributed to external forcing such as stratospheric ozone depletion and greenhouse gas (GHG) increases. Several studies have shown that climate models are able to simulate observed changes when forced by observed ozone trends or combined ozone and GHG trends. However, as some of these studies suffered from erroneously specified forcing, the reason for the circulation intensification remains debatable. Here, we re-approach this issue using data from 21 CMIP3 models. We demonstrate that only models that include ozone depletion simulate downward propagation of the circulation changes from the stratosphere to the troposphere similar to that observed, with GHG increases causing significant Antarctic geopotential height trends only in the lower troposphere. These changes are simulated by the majority of the ozone-forced models except those with the lowest vertical resolution between 300 hPa and 10 hPa. Citation: Karpechko, A. Yu., N. P. Gillett, G. J. Marshall, and A. A. Scaife (2008), Stratospheric influence on circulation changes in the Southern Hemisphere troposphere in coupled climate models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L20806, doi: 10.1029/2008GL035354.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据