4.6 Article

Post-seismic and interseismic fault creep I: model description

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL
卷 181, 期 1, 页码 81-98

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04522.x

关键词

Seismic cycle; Rheology and friction of fault zones; Dynamics and mechanics of faulting

资金

  1. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  2. Caltech Tectonic Observatory [116]
  3. Caltech Seismological Laboratory [10,032]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a model of localized, aseismic fault creep during the full interseismic period, including both transient and steady fault creep, in response to a sequence of imposed coseismic slip events and tectonic loading. We consider the behaviour of models with linear viscous, non-linear viscous, rate-dependent friction, and rate- and state-dependent friction fault rheologies. Both the transient post-seismic creep and the pattern of steady interseismic creep rates surrounding asperities depend on recent coseismic slip and fault rheologies. In these models, post-seismic fault creep is manifest as pulses of elevated creep rates that propagate from the coseismic slip, these pulses feature sharper fronts and are longer lived in models with rate- state friction compared to other models. With small characteristic slip distances in rate- state friction models, interseismic creep is similar to that in models with rate- dependent friction faults, except for the earliest periods of post-seismic creep. Our model can be used to constrain fault rheologies from geodetic observations in cases where the coseismic slip history is relatively well known. When only considering surface deformation over a short period of time, there are strong trade-offs between fault rheology and the details of the imposed coseismic slip. Geodetic observations over longer times following an earthquake will reduce these trade-offs, while simultaneous modelling of interseismic and post-seismic observations provide the strongest constraints on fault rheologies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据