4.6 Article

Non-linearity and temporal changes of fault zone site response associated with strong ground motion

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL
卷 176, 期 1, 页码 265-278

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2008.04005.x

关键词

Elasticity and anelasticity; Fault zone rheology; Earthquake ground motions; Site effects; Wave propagation

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [EAR-0710959]
  2. Southern California Earthquake Center [EAR-0529922]
  3. USGS Cooperative Agreement [07HQAG0008]
  4. SCEC [1242]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We systematically analyse temporal changes of fault zone (FZ) site response along the Karadere-Duzce branch of the North Anatolian fault that ruptured during the 1999. Izmit and Duzce earthquake sequences. The study is based primarily on spectral ratios of strong motion seismic data recorded by a FZ station and a station similar to 400 m away from the fault and augmented by analysis of weak motion records. The observations are used to track non-linear behaviour and temporal changes of the FZ site response. The peak spectral ratio increases 80-150 per cent and the peak frequency drops 20-40 per cent at the time of the Duzce main shock. These co-main shock changes are followed by a logarithmic recovery over an apparent timescale of similar to 1 d. However, analysis of temporal changes at each individual station using weak motion waveforms generated by repeating earthquakes show lower-amplitude longer-duration logarithmic recoveries that are not detected by the spectral ratio analysis. The results are consistent with a reduction of S-wave velocities in the top 100-300 m during the Duzce main shock of 20-50 per cent or more and logarithmic post-main shock recovery on a timescale of 3 months or more. The observations support previous suggestions that non-linear wave propagation effects and temporal changes of seismic properties are generated in the shallow material by strong ground motion of nearby major earthquakes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据