4.6 Review

Assessment of multiple and interacting modes of soil loss in the karst critical zone, Southwest China (SWC)

期刊

GEOMORPHOLOGY
卷 322, 期 -, 页码 97-106

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.08.043

关键词

Karst; Soil erosion; Subsurface soil loss; Soil leakage

资金

  1. Council of the International Geoscience Programme [IGCP 661]
  2. Guangxi Science and Technology Planning Project [1212011220958, 1598016-11, 1598019-10]
  3. Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences [YYWF201508, YYWF201639]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In Southwest China (SWC) soil loss is becoming a serious threat to the sustainable development of resources and the health of the environment. A large number of studies have been conducted to investigate the causes (e.g. environmental factors and human activities) and impacts (e.g. karst rocky desertification) of soil loss. However, the following are some important problems related to soil loss in the karst of SWC: 1) although soil loss is caused by chemical weathering, gravity and water interaction in karst, the mechanisms by which soil loss takes place in the SWC and their interaction are still not clear; 2) subsurface soil loss varies under different geological and hydrological conditions, and there is still no consensus on the common the ratio between surface soil erosion and underground soil loss; 3) traditional methods for soil loss risk assessment are difficult to apply over the whole of SWC; and 4) a large number of studies have been published only in Chinese and remain inaccessible to the international science community. Therefore, a review paper is needed to address this gap and introduce the contributions of Chinese researchers to soil loss in karst. This paper proposes a novel modelling approach for the grouped soil loss styles and presents a comprehensive discussion for the mechanism, causes, and risk assessment of the various soil loss styles in SWC karst. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据