4.6 Article

GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping of the Zhongxian segment in the Three Gorges area, China

期刊

GEOMORPHOLOGY
卷 115, 期 1-2, 页码 23-31

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.09.025

关键词

Causative factors; Landslide susceptibility; Logical regression; Three Gorges area; China

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40801212, 49971064]
  2. National Key Basic Research Program [2007CB416602]
  3. Chendu University of Technology, China [GZ2007-11]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A detailed landslide susceptibility map was produced using a logistic regression method with datasets developed for a geographic information system (GIS). Known as one of the most landslide-prone areas in China, the Zhongxian-Shizhu segment in the Three Gorges Reservoir region of China was selected as a suitable case to evaluate the frequency and distribution of landslides. The site covered an area of 260.9 km(2) with a landslide area of 5.3 km(2). Four data domains were used in this study: remote sensing products, thematic maps, geological maps, and topographical maps, all with 25 x 25 m(2) pixels or cells. Statistical relationships for landslide susceptibility were developed using landslide and landslide causative factor databases. We extended the application of logistic regression approaches to use all continuous variables as they are, and the landslide density is used to transform these nominal variables to numeric variable. According to the map, 2.8% of the study area was identified as an area with very high-susceptibility, whereas very low-, low-, medium- and high-susceptibility zones covered 18.2%, 36.2%, 26.7%, and 16.1% of the area, respectively. The quality of susceptibility mapping was validated, and the correct classification percentage and root mean square error (RMSE) values for the validation data were 81.4% and 0.392, respectively. Crown Copyright (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据