4.6 Article

Basin-wide sediment trapping efficiency of emerging reservoirs along the Mekong

期刊

GEOMORPHOLOGY
卷 119, 期 3-4, 页码 181-197

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.03.018

关键词

Reservoir; Dam; Reservoir sediment trapping efficiency; Trapped sediment load; Mekong Basin

资金

  1. Aalto University
  2. Academy of Finland [111672]
  3. Maa-ja vesitekniikan tuki ry
  4. National University of Singapore [R-109-000-086-646]
  5. Academy of Finland (AKA) [111672, 111672] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Mekong Basin has remained relatively intact, but the current plans for rapid development in the hydropower sector may threaten the riverine ecosystems. Should all the plans be materialized in tributaries and mainstream, the cumulative active storage capacity of the reservoirs would increase more than tenfold from the present level to around 20% of the annual discharge of the Mekong (505 km(3)). In this study a protocol is developed to estimate the trapping efficiency (TE) of the existing and planned reservoirs in the Mekong Basin based on Brune's method. The existing reservoirs have a basin TE of 15-18% and should all the planned reservoirs be built, this will increase to 51-69%. However, due to the high heterogeneity of the specific sediment yield in different parts of the basin, the trapped sediment load (TSL) is predicted to be much higher. The existing and planned mainstream dams in the Chinese part of the river have the largest impact on the river sediment load (SL) as more than 60% of the basin SL originates from this stretch of the river. The three existing reservoirs in that part of the basin have potential to trap annually approximately 32-41 Mt of sediment. If the entire cascade of eight dams is constructed, TE will increase to 78-81%, and potentially 70-73 Mt, i.e. more than 50% of the total basin sediment load (similar to 140 Mt) will be trapped annually. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据