4.3 Article

Bacterial Community of the Largest Oligosaline Lake, Namco on the Tibetan Plateau

期刊

GEOMICROBIOLOGY JOURNAL
卷 27, 期 8, 页码 669-682

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01490450903528000

关键词

bacterial community; Lake Namco; oligosaline lake; 16s rRNA; Tibetan Plateau

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China [2005CB422004]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40871045, 40810019001, 40830743, 40874033]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bacterial abundances and diversity in the surface water of Lake Namco, the largest oligosaline lake on the Tibetan Plateau, were examined using flow cytometry approach and constructing 16S rRNA gene clone libraries. Bacterial abundances were from 0.08 x 106 to 1.6 x 106 cells mL-1, and were in the reported range of other lakes of the Tibetan Plateau and high mountain regions. Bacterial abundances were significantly correlated with the concentrations of chlorophyll a (chl a), but showed no significant relationship with the dissolved organic carbon (DOC), which suggested that the amount of DOC released by algae was the key factor determining the bacterial abundance rather than the total DOC. The total trace elements concentrations also obviously connected with bacterial abundances, and 9 of 20 elements showed significant relationship. Bacterial 16S rRNA gene clone sequences were affiliated to the -, -, -, -, and epsilon-Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Cyanobacteria, Firmicutes, Acidobacteria, Planctomycetes, Verrucomicrobia, Candidate division OD1, or unclassified, and among these the -Proteobacteria dominated. Bacteria in Lake Namco were most closely related to those retrieved from freshwater habitats. Relatively few sequences were closely related to those recovered from saline habitats. Eleven of 34 typical freshwater bacterial clusters were detected in the oligosaline Lake Namco. Bacterial diversity within the lake varied and was connected with the concentrations of DOC and chl a.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据