4.7 Article

Transatlantic distribution of the Alaskan White River Ash

期刊

GEOLOGY
卷 42, 期 10, 页码 875-878

出版社

GEOLOGICAL SOC AMER, INC
DOI: 10.1130/G35945.1

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (Canada)
  2. Natural Environment Research Council (UK) [NE/G019851/1, NE/G020272/1, NE/G02006X/1]
  3. U.S. National Science Foundation [0909541, 1204176]
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/G02006X/1, NE/G020272/1, NE/G019851/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. NERC [NE/G02006X/1, NE/G020272/1, NE/G019851/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Office of Polar Programs (OPP)
  7. Directorate For Geosciences [1204176] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Volcanic ash layers preserved within the geologic record represent precise time markers that correlate disparate depositional environments and enable the investigation of synchronous and/or asynchronous behaviors in Earth system and archaeological sciences. However, it is generally assumed that only exceptionally powerful events, such as supereruptions (>= 450 km(3) of ejecta as dense-rock equivalent; recurrence interval of similar to 10(5) yr), distribute ash broadly enough to have an impact on human society, or allow us to address geologic, climatic, and cultural questions on an intercontinental scale. Here we use geochemical, age, and morphological evidence to show that the Alaskan White River Ash (eastern lobe; A.D. 833-850) correlates to the AD860B ash (A.D. 846-848) found in Greenland and northern Europe. These occurrences represent the distribution of an ash over 7000 km, linking marine, terrestrial, and ice-core records. Our results indicate that tephra from more moderate-size eruptions, with recurrence intervals of similar to 100 yr, can have substantially greater distributions than previously thought, with direct implications for volcanic dispersal studies, correlation of widely distributed proxy records, and volcanic hazard assessment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据