4.7 Article

Astronomical climate control on paleosol stacking patterns in the upper Paleocene-lower Eocene Willwood Formation, Bighorn Basin, Wyoming

期刊

GEOLOGY
卷 36, 期 7, 页码 531-534

出版社

GEOLOGICAL SOC AMER, INC
DOI: 10.1130/G24734A.1

关键词

paleosols; Milankovitch theory; spectral analysis; Bighorn Basin; avulsion

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Willwood Formation of the Bighorn Basin (Wyoming, USA) is a thick succession of upper Paleocene and lower Eocene fluvial-floodplain sandstones and mudstones. Reddish paleosols, formed on the floodplain mudstones, alternate rhythmically on various scales with heterolithic intervals of small-channel sandstones and mudstones showing weak pedogenesis. Spectral analysis of redness in the Willwood successions at Polecat Bench and Red Butte reveals significant spectral peaks corresponding to cycle thicknesses of similar to 8 and similar to 3 m. The similar to 8 m cycle reflects distinct clusters of 3-5 paleosols. Age constraints show that the period of this cycle closely matches the similar to 21 k.y. climatic precession cycle. The similar to 3 m cycle corresponds to individual paleosols, with a period of 7-8 k.y. This period is similar to millennial-scale sub-Milankovitch cycles found in marine and lacustrine successions of Pliocene-Pleistocene age. Precession and millennial-scale climate variations probably affected paleosol development through cyclic changes from predominantly overbank to predominantly channel-avulsion deposition, with the latter periodically halting soil formation because of high sediment accumulation. A new age model was developed for the Paleocene-Eocene carbon isotope excursion (CIE) at Polecat Bench, based on the precessional origin of paleosol clusters. The main body of the CIE spans similar to 5.5 precession cycles, or similar to 115 k.y., and the recovery tail of the CIE spans 2 precession cycles, or similar to 42 k.y. This outcome is consistent with, and independently confirms, recent estimates of CIE duration based on deep-sea cores.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据