4.3 Review

First record of Mesozoic terrestrial vertebrates from Lithuania: phytosaurs (Diapsida: Archosauriformes) of probable Late Triassic age, with a review of phytosaur biogeography

期刊

GEOLOGICAL MAGAZINE
卷 150, 期 1, 页码 110-122

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0016756812000428

关键词

palaeobiogeography; Lithuania; phytosaurs; stratigraphy; Triassic; vertebrate palaeontology

资金

  1. NSF
  2. American Museum of Natural History
  3. Paleontological Society
  4. Columbia University
  5. Percy Sladen Memorial Fund
  6. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  7. DFG [BU 2587/3-1]
  8. National Geographic Polska

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fossils of Mesozoic terrestrial vertebrates from Lithuania and the wider East Baltic region of Europe have previously been unknown. We here report the first Mesozoic terrestrial vertebrate fossils from Lithuania: two premaxillary specimens and three teeth that belong to Phytosauria, a common clade of semiaquatic Triassic archosauriforms. These specimens represent an uncrested phytosaur, similar to several species within the genera Paleorhinus, Parasuchus, Rutiodon and Nicrosaurus. Because phytosaurs are currently only known from the Upper Triassic, their discovery in northwestern Lithuania (the Saltiskiai clay-pit) suggests that at least part of the Triassic succession in this region is Late Triassic in age, and is not solely Early Triassic as has been previously considered. The new specimens are among the most northerly occurrences of phytosaurs in the Late Triassic, as Lithuania was approximately 7-10. further north than classic phytosaur-bearing localities in nearby Germany and Poland, and as much as 40. further north than the best-sampled phytosaur localities in North America. The far northerly occurrence of the Lithuanian fossils prompts a review of phytosaur biogeography and distribution, which suggests that these predators were widely distributed in the Triassic monsoonal belt but rarer in more arid regions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据