4.4 Article

Palaeontological age and correlations of the Tertiary deposits of the NW Iberian Peninsula: the tectonic evolution of a broken foreland basin

期刊

GEOLOGICAL JOURNAL
卷 49, 期 1, 页码 15-27

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/gj.2484

关键词

broken foreland basin; basin migration; Alpine Orogeny; NW Iberian peninsula; Alpine Pyrenean-Cantabrian Orogen; palaeogeography

资金

  1. Consolider Ingenio TopoIberia [CSD2006-041]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ages of Cenozoic sedimentary basins yield information that can be used to infer detailed spatial and temporal evolution in the Alpine foreland. The Tertiary deposits of the NW Iberian Peninsula comprise the remains of a broken foreland basin (the West Duero Basin). This work constrains the timing of tectonic fragmentation and the evolution of the western termination of the Alpine Pyrenean-Cantabrian Orogen (NW Iberian Peninsula). The discovery of Issiodoromys cf. minor 1 and Pseudocricetodon in the lower formation of the Tertiary depression of Sarria (the Toral Formation) constrains its age to the late Early Oligocene (MP23-MP25), similar to its age in the El Bierzo depression (MP24-MP25). Sedimentation initiated in the NE of the study area at Oviedo during the Middle Eocene (Bartonian-Early Priabonian MP16-MP17) and migrated towards the west and south during the Early Oligocene. The Toral Formation was deposited in a foreland basin that connected the present day outcrops of the El Bierzo, Sarria and As Pontes Tertiary depressions. The basin was segmented during the westward migration of structural deformation associated with the Orogen, and the subsequent uplift of the Galaico-Leoneses Mountains. The present-day height above reference level of the base of the Toral Formation has been used to quantify Alpine segmentation that took place after Early Oligocene times. Minimum tectonic uplift assessed is 960m in the Cantabrian Mountains and 1050m in the Galaico-Leoneses Mountains. Copyright (c) 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据