4.7 Article

Tillage impacts on the fractions and compositions of soil organic carbon

期刊

GEODERMA
卷 189, 期 -, 页码 397-403

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.06.001

关键词

Black soil; Carbon associated with aggregates; CPMAS C-13 NMR; Functional group

资金

  1. country's 12th Five-Year Plan project [201103001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to reveal the impacts of tillage systems on the fractions (active, slow, and passive carbon) and chemical compositions of soil organic carbon (SOC). A long-term (26 years) tillage experiment in northeast China examined no-tillage (NT), plowing tillage (PT) and deep loosing (DL). The soil samples (from a depth of 0-20 cm) were wet-sieved into five aggregate classes (1000-2000 mu m, 500-1000 mu m, 250-500 mu m, 50-250 mu m, and <50 mu m). The active carbon (C) and passive C were detected in the 500-1000 mu m, 250-500 mu m, and 50-250 mu m aggregates, and the chemical compositions of SOC in micro-aggregates (<250 mu m) and macro-aggregates (>250 mu m) were assessed by CPMAS C-13 NMR. Macro-aggregates contained more SOC concentration than micro-aggregates. However, PT resulted in a greater SOC concentration in 50-500 mu m aggregates. NT and DL increased the active C and decreased the slow C in 500-1000 mu m aggregates, whereas PT showed the inverse. The C-13 NMR spectrum demonstrated that NT increased alkyl-C content, PT obtained a higher carbonyl-C concentration, and DL gained a greater O-alkyl-C concentration. Moreover, evaluating the impacts of tillage systems on the complexity revealed that the most complicated structure was presented in NT, the least in PT, whereas DL had an intermediate effect. Active C contains C2-C6 carbohydrate and anomeric C (Cl) polysaccharides, slow c consists of aldehyde-C, ketonic-C and quinone-C, and the passive C is enriched in aromatic-C. In conclusion, long-term tillage systems significantly affected the fractions and compositions of SOC. with NT stabilizing the SOC. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据