4.7 Article

Estimating soil organic carbon storage and distribution in a catchment of Loess Plateau, China

期刊

GEODERMA
卷 154, 期 3-4, 页码 261-266

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.10.011

关键词

Soil organic carbon density; Soil organic carbon storage; Soil organic carbon distribution; The Loess Plateau

资金

  1. National Key Basic Research Support Foundation of China [2007CB106803]
  2. Northwest Sci-Tech University of Agriculture and Forestry
  3. National Research Support Foundation of China [2006BAD091306]
  4. West Light Foundation of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [2006YB04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using soil as a carbon sink to sequester carbon dioxide has attracted much attention. But there is little research on soil organic carbon (SOC) in the Loess Plateau because of the extremely complex topography. In this study, SOC storage was estimated based on a soil survey of a small catchment in the Loess Plateau, northwest China. The SOC content of 169 profiles and the bulk density of 12 profiles were measured. The study area was classified into six different classes: farmland, grassland, shrub land, woodland, gully, Aeolian sandy soil. Results showed that the soil bulk density and SOC content are affected by land use and soil types, and the relationship between them could be expressed by a power function. Grassland had the highest SOC density, and next came farmland. Gully and Aeolian sandy soil had the lowest SOC density. The SOC content per area in the grassland and farmland was higher than the other classes and the shrub land was similar to the woodland while the Aeolian sandy soil and gully were the lowest. All of the changes in the cumulative SOC storage with the increasing depth follows a logarithmic model. The SOC storage in the catchment of farmland, grassland, shrub land, woodland, gully, and Aeolian sandy soil was estimated as 3.32 x 10(6) kg, 9.45 x 10(6) kg, 1.023 x 10(7) kg, 2.73 x 10(6) kg, 5.76 x 10(6) kg, and 2.94 x 10(6) kg, respectively. The total SOC storage of 100 cm depth in the catchment is 3.443 x 10(7) kg. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据