4.7 Article

Chelator-enhanced phytoextraction of heavy metals from contaminated soil irrigated by industrial wastewater with the hyperaccumulator plant (Sedum alfredii Hance)

期刊

GEODERMA
卷 150, 期 1-2, 页码 106-112

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.01.016

关键词

Heavy metal contamination; Chelator; Phytorextraction; Hyperaccumulator; Sedum alfredii Hance

资金

  1. hi-tech research and development program (863) of China [2006AA06Z386]
  2. Sino-Russion joint Research Center on Natural Resources and Eco-Environmental Sciences
  3. Ministry of Education, People's Republic of China [707011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Enhanced phytoextraction of heavy metals using chelating agents and metal-hyperaccumulators has been proposed as an effective approach to removing heavy metals from contaminated soils. The effects of application of EDTA and citric acid (CA) on the growth of Sedum alfredii and its heavy metal uptake and accumulation were investigated using the pot-culture experiments. The application of EDTA (5 and 8 mmol kg(-1)) and CA (5 and 8 mmol kg(-1)) had inhibitory effects on the growth of the plants, resulted in 60.0%, 50.0%, 55.6% and 85.0% reduction in shoot dry biomass, respectively, compared with that in the control. However, the addition of chelators effectively increased the mobility of target heavy metals (Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn) in soils, and significantly enhanced the accumulation of these heavy metals in aerial parts of the plants. The concentrations of Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn increased by 2.37-4.86. 0.09-3.73, 0.33-5.06 and 3.71-6.06 times, respectively, compared with the control. The application of EDTA (5 and 8 mmol kg(-1)) and CA (5 and 8 mmol kg(-1)) could markedly enhance Cd and Zn accumulation. up to 970.6-1463.9 and 3288.3-5376.6 mu g pot(-1) DW, respectively. The most effective method for Cd and Zn accumulation was the treatment of 8 mmol kg(-1) CA. As for Pb, the addition of 5 mmol kg(-1) CA was obtained the maximum value of phytoextraction. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据