4.7 Article

Reduction of selenite by cysteine in ionic media

期刊

GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA
卷 124, 期 -, 页码 98-108

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2013.09.019

关键词

-

资金

  1. Division Of Ocean Sciences
  2. Directorate For Geosciences [0752972] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper focuses on the abiotic reduction of selenite (Se(IV)) by cysteine (Cys, NH3+CH(CH2SH) COOH), which is a representative thiol produced by aquatic organism under oxidative stress. The rates of reduction of Se(IV) by cysteine were measured in deaerated NaCl solutions and natural waters as a function of pH (4.0-9.0), temperature (10-40 degrees C), and ionic strength (0.01-1.0 M). The rates showed a complex dependence on pH with similar values from pH 4.0-5.0, increasing values from pH 5.0-7.0 and then decreasing values at pH higher than 7.0. An apparent energy of activation obtained was 31 +/- 6 kJ mol(-1), which was independent of ionic strength. The reaction is due to the following interaction HSeO3- + H(2)Cys(0) k(ST)reversible arrow k(-ST)[ST] k(Se(0))-> Products where the selenotrisulfide [ST] is the complex intermediate RS-Se-SR with R = NH3+CH(CH2)COO-. The intermediate ST then decomposes in the final products Se(0) and cystine. The pseudo-first-order rate constant is written as k(1) = k(ST) x (1 - k(-ST)/k(-ST) + k(Se)(0)) x alpha(HSeO3) x alpha(H2Cys0) x [Cys](T) where the second-order rate constant (k(ST)) was calculated as (2.0 +/- 0.2) x 10(3) M-1 min(-1) and was compared with the second-order rate constants of other reductants (hydrogen sulfide, ascorbic acid). In neutrality and alkaline solution, [ST] undergoes rapid decomposition and the term (1 - k(-ST)/k(-ST) + k(Se(0))) approximates 1 and may be neglected. k(1) = k(ST) x alpha(-)(HSeO3) x alpha(H2Cys0) x [Cys](T) Environmental significance of the results and the importance of abiotic vs biotic reactions are also briefly discussed. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据