4.7 Article

Carbonate clumped isotope compositions of modern marine mollusk and brachiopod shells

期刊

GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA
卷 106, 期 -, 页码 307-325

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2012.12.020

关键词

-

资金

  1. Norwegian Research Council
  2. Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences at Johns Hopkins University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present an empirical calibration of the carbonate clumped isotope thermometer based on mollusk and brachiopod shells from natural and controlled environments spanning water temperatures of -1.0 to 29.5 degrees C. The clumped isotope data (Delta(47)) are normalized to CO2 gases with equilibrium distributions of clumped isotopologues at high temperature (1000 degrees C) and low temperature (27 or 30 degrees C), and thus the calibration is unique in being directly referenced to a carbon dioxide equilibrium reference frame (Dennis et al., 2011, Defining an absolute reference frame for clumped isotope studies of CO2, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 75, 7117-7131). The shell clumped isotope data define the following relation as a function of temperature (in kelvin): Delta(47) = 0.0327 x 10(6)/T-2 + 0.3286 (r(2) = 0.84). The temperature sensitivity (slope) of this relation is lower than those based on corals, fish otoliths, foraminifera, and coccoliths, but is similar to theoretical predictions for calcite based on lattice dynamics calculations. We find no convincing methodological or biological explanations for the difference in temperature sensitivity between this calibration and the previous calibrations, and suggest that the discrepancy might represent real but unknown differences in mineral-DIC clumped isotope fractionation between mollusks/brachiopods and other taxa. Nevertheless, revised analytical methods similar to those used in this study are now in wide use, and it will be important to develop calibrations for other taxonomic groups using these updated methods, with analyses directly referenced to the carbon dioxide equilibrium reference frame. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据