4.7 Article

Incorporation of magnesium into fish otoliths: Determining contribution from water and diet

期刊

GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA
卷 94, 期 -, 页码 12-21

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2012.07.003

关键词

-

资金

  1. Murray-Darling Basin Authority's Native Fish Strategy [MD741]
  2. University of Adelaide
  3. NSW Department of Primary Industries
  4. University of Adelaide Animal Ethics Committee [S-095-2007A]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Magnesium is a commonly measured element in otolith chemistry analysis and is often included in the suite of elements used to discriminate fish from different environments. Poor relations between Mg in water and otolith chemistry are, however, often found. We examined the uptake of Mg into the otoliths of a freshwater fish (silver perch Bidyanus bidyanus), to determine the extent to which this element can be used to record previous environmental conditions. Silver perch fingerlings were reared for 30 days in water with four concentrations of Mg (14.5, 36.6, 52.1 and 69.6 mg L-1) and fed on a diet supplemented with a combination of natural Mg and enriched Mg-26 at five concentrations (1496, 1626, 1902, 2005 and 2036 mu g g(-1)). Enriched Mg-26 was added to the diet to achieve a Mg-26/Mg-25 ratio that was different from the natural ratio, such that the relative contribution of water and diet to Mg incorporated into otoliths could be determined. Enriching the diet with Mg-26 resulted in an isotope shift in the otolith of silver perch from the natural Mg-26/Mg-25 ratio of 1.10-1.42; however, this was not as high as the ratio in the diet (> 3.7) suggesting that the fish did not fully incorporate Mg from the diet. Water was the primary source of otolith Mg, contributing on average > 80% to otolith Mg (range 74-95%). The fact that Mg concentrations in the otolith did not change in response to Mg concentrations in the water or diet, indicates that Mg is likely physiologically regulated and therefore is not a reliable environmental indicator. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据