4.7 Article

Effects of aridity and vegetation on plant-wax δD in modern lake sediments

期刊

GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA
卷 74, 期 20, 页码 5785-5797

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2010.06.018

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [EAR-0741400]
  2. Canadian Institute for Advanced Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We analyzed the deuterium composition of individual plant-waxes in lake sediments from 28 watersheds that span a range of precipitation D/H, vegetation types and climates. The apparent isotopic fractionation (epsilon(a)) between plant-wax n-alkanes and precipitation differs with watershed ecosystem type and structure, and decreases with increasing regional aridity as measured by enrichment of H-2 and O-18 associated with evaporation of lake waters. The most negative epsilon(a) values represent signatures least affected by aridity; these values were -125 +/- 5 parts per thousand for tropical evergreen and dry forests, -130 parts per thousand for a temperate broadleaf forest, -120 +/- 9 parts per thousand for the high-altitude tropical paramo (herbs, shrubs and grasses), and -98 +/- 6 parts per thousand for North American montane gymnosperm forests. Minimum epsilon(a) values reflect ecosystem-dependent differences in leaf water enrichment and soil evaporation. Slopes of lipid/lake water isotopic enrichments differ slightly with ecosystem structure (i.e. open shrublands versus forests) and overall are quite small (slopes = 0-2), indicating low sensitivity of lipid delta D variations to aridity compared with coexisting lake waters. This finding provides an approach for reconstructing ancient precipitation signatures based on plant-wax delta D measurements and independent proxies for lake water changes with regional aridity. To illustrate this approach, we employ paired plant-wax delta D and carbonate-delta O-18 measurements on lake sediments to estimate the isotopic composition of Miocene precipitation on the Tibetan plateau. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据