4.5 Article

Chlorine isotope constraints on fluid-rock interactions during subduction and exhumation of the Zermatt-Saas ophiolite

期刊

GEOCHEMISTRY GEOPHYSICS GEOSYSTEMS
卷 14, 期 10, 页码 4370-4391

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/ggge.20269

关键词

chlorine; stable isotope; fluid-assisted mass transfer; high pressure; subduction

资金

  1. NSF [EAR-0911669]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chlorine isotope compositions of high-pressure (similar to 2.3 GPa) serpentinite, rodingite, and hydrothermally altered oceanic crust (AOC) differ significantly from high- and ultrahigh-pressure (> 3.2 GPa) metasedimentary rocks in the Aosta region, Italy. Texturally early serpentinites, rodingites, and AOC have bulk delta Cl-37 values indistinguishable from those of modern seafloor analogues (delta Cl-37 = -1.0 to +1.0%). In contrast, serpentinites and AOC samples that recrystallized during exhumation have low delta Cl-37 values (-2.7 to -0.5%); Cl-37 depletion correlates with progressive changes in bulk chemistry. HP/UHP metasediments have low delta Cl-37 values (median = -2.5%) that differ statistically from modern marine sediments (median = -0.6%). Cl in metasedimentary rocks is concentrated in texturally early minerals, indicating modification of seafloor compositions early in the subduction history. The data constrain fluid sources during both subduction and exhumation-related phases of fluid-rock interaction : (1) marine sediments at the top of the downgoing plate likely interacted with isotopically light pore fluids from the accretionary wedge in the early stages of subduction. (2) No pervasive interaction with externally derived fluid occurred during subsequent subduction to the maximum depths of burial. (3) Localized mixing between serpentinites and fluids released by previously isotopically modified metasediments occurred during exhumation in the subduction channel. Most samples, however, preserved protolith signatures during subduction to near-arc depths.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据