4.5 Article

Origins of 210Pb-226Ra disequilibria in basalts: New insights from the 1978 Asal Rift eruption

期刊

GEOCHEMISTRY GEOPHYSICS GEOSYSTEMS
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2012GC004173

关键词

Asal Rift; U-series disequilibria; basalt; degassing; differentiation; 1009 Geochemistry; Geochemical modeling (3610,8410); 1036 Geochemistry; Magma chamber processes (3618); 1037 Geochemistry; Magma genesis and partial melting (3619)

资金

  1. Australian Research Council Discovery Proposal [DP0988658]
  2. ARC LIEF
  3. DEST Systemic Infrastructure Grants, Macquarie University and Industry
  4. NSF [EAR 0738776]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There has been much debate as to whether Pb-210-Ra-226 disequilibria in young volcanic rocks result from partial melting, cumulate interaction or magma degassing. Here we present new data from basalts erupted in 1978 from Ardoukoba volcano in the Asal Rift. The (Pb-210/Ra-226)(t) ratios are very low (0.2 to 0.6) and appear to correlate negatively with (Ra-226/Th-230). Invariant (Th-230/U-238) and (Pa-231/U-235) ratios require similar melting rates, porosities, and extents for all parental magmas. Thus, the range in (Ra-226/Th-230), which is negatively correlated with Th concentration, reflects fractional crystallization over millennia after the magmas were emplaced into the crust. This precludes the Pb-210 deficits from resulting from partial melting. Instead, the Pb-210 deficits must have formed subsequent to magma differentiation and are interpreted to reflect several decades of magma degassing. Many young basalts erupted in a variety of tectonic settings are similarly depleted in Pb-210 with respect to Ra-226, suggesting that they continuously degas over a period of a few to several decades, perhaps reflecting the time required to rise to the surface from deeper reservoirs. In some of these basalts, gas accumulation leads to the shallowest, most evolved, and earliest erupting magmas having the highest (Pb-210/Ra-226) ratios and sometimes Pb-210 excesses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据