4.5 Article

Signal linearity of an extended range pulse counting detector: Applications to accurate and precise U-Pb dating of zircon by laser ablation quadrupole ICP-MS

期刊

GEOCHEMISTRY GEOPHYSICS GEOSYSTEMS
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2010GC003198

关键词

zircon; geochronology; LA-ICP-MS; detector linearity

资金

  1. American Chemical Society
  2. State of Texas Norman Hackerman Advanced Research Program
  3. NSF/IF [0824967]
  4. NASA [NNX09AC06G]
  5. Directorate For Geosciences
  6. Division Of Earth Sciences [0824967] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. NASA [NNX09AC06G, 120816] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Element concentration and isotope ratio measurements by single-collector mass spectrometry often require the detection system to handle ion beams with very large intensity ratios. In order to obtain accurate and reproducible element concentration and isotope ratio data, the detection system must have a linear response with respect to the intensity of the incident ion beam. An extended range scaling pulse counting detector equipped on a Varian 810 quadrupole inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometer (ICP-MS) was tested for linearity across count rates of similar to 2000 to 110,000,000 cps with different concentrations of natural U solutions. We also tested detector linearity by the laser ablation analysis of Pb-206/U-238, Pb-207/U-235, and Pb-207/Pb-206 ratios in well-characterized 416-1565 Ma zircon standards. Results indicate that there is no correlation between the measured isotope ratio and ion intensity for the solution tests or the tests of natural zircon standards. The results of these tests confirm the suitability of this instrument for isotope ratio measurements that require a substantial dynamic range without having to switch between pulse counting and analog modes on electron multipliers or switching between electron multiplier to Faraday detectors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据