4.5 Article

Lithological composition of the North American continent and implications of lithological map resolution for dissolved silica flux modeling

期刊

GEOCHEMISTRY GEOPHYSICS GEOSYSTEMS
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2010GC003259

关键词

lithology; silica; North America; rock types; Earth system model

资金

  1. DFG [EXC177, HA7742/6-1]
  2. Utrecht University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lithological maps are important tools for applications sensitive to physical or chemical attributes of rocks. They aggregate rock types into a limited set of classes. Most studies on river elementary fluxes derived from chemical weathering use local lithological maps, and some upscale their results to global scales, using global lithological maps. It remains unclear if those maps sufficiently represent the heterogeneous local lithological settings. To analyze this in more detail a new lithological map of North America containing 262,111 polygons is presented and compared to three global lithological maps. The impact of the differences is demonstrated using four models of dissolved silica mobilization from the terrestrial land system into river systems (DSi mobilization), calibrated using each map. According to the new map, North America is composed of 62.8% sediments, 14.8% plutonics, 13.3% metamorphics, and 7.2% volcanics. In all four maps, the total proportions of rock types are comparable for North America, but their spatial distribution differs largely. The calculated DSi mobilization differs weakly between the maps (-20% to +9%) compared to the results of the model calibrated on the new map for North America but strongly (-59% to +38%) for tributary regions of regional seas around North America. The map comparison suggests that lithological classes of different data sets may represent different attributes although they may share the same name. Applications (e.g., Earth system models) considering lateral weathering derived matter fluxes should use data derived from different lithological source data sets with care.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据