4.2 Review

Review of the fossil pufferfish genus Archaeotetraodon (Teleostei, Tetraodontidae), with description of three new taxa from the Miocene of Italy

期刊

GEOBIOS
卷 43, 期 3, 页码 283-304

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.geobios.2009.10.005

关键词

Teleostei; Tetraodontidae; Archaeotetraodon; New species; Paleoecology; Fossil record

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Three new species of the extinct pufferfish genus Archaeotetraodon are described from the Middle to Upper Miocene of Italy A. bannikovi nov. sp., A. dicarloi nov. sp. and A. zafaranai nov. sp.), and compared in detail with the three previously described taxa of the genus [A. jamestyleri (Bannikov), A. winterbottomi Tyler and Bannikov and A. cerrinaferoni Carnevale and Santini], which are known, respectively, from the Miocene of Ukraine, the Oligocene of Russia, and the Miocene of Algeria. The three new species described herein bring the number of known Archaeotetraodon species to six, thereby making it by far the most speciose extinct genus of the order Tetraodontiformes. The monophyly of Archaeotetraodon is supported by two derived conditions: bifid scale spinules (versus single spinules in all other tetraodontids), and the fusion of the haemal spine of the penultimate vertebra to the centrum (versus autogenous in all other tetraodontids). We compare a large suite of morphological features of Archaeotetraodon to those found within the group of more basal tetraodontid genera to which we believe it belongs, but we are unable to determine the closest relationships of Archaeotetraodon within that group. Morphofunctional and paleoenvironmental considerations suggest that the species of the genus Archaeotetraodon were adapted to a pelagic or deep-sea lifestyle and were probably able to tolerate relatively low oxygen concentrations. The entire fossil record of the family Tetraodontidae is discussed. (C) 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据