4.4 Article

Organic Sulfur Metabolisms in Hydrothermal Environments

期刊

GEOBIOLOGY
卷 10, 期 4, 页码 320-332

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-4669.2012.00324.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. RIDGE
  2. University of Missouri

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sulfur is central to the metabolisms of many organisms that inhabit extreme environments. While biotic and abiotic cycling of organic sulfur compounds has been well documented in low-temperature anaerobic environments, cycling of organic sulfur in hydrothermal environments has received less attention. Recently published thermodynamic data have been used to estimate aqueous alkyl thiol and sulfide activities in deep-sea hydrothermal systems. Here we use geochemical mixing models to predict fluid compositions that result from mixing end-member hydrothermal fluid from the East Pacific Rise with bottom seawater. These fluid compositions are combined with estimates of methanethiol and dimethylsulfide activities to evaluate energy yields for potential organic sulfur-based metabolisms under hydrothermal conditions. Aerobic respiration has the highest energy yields (over -240 kJ/mol e-) at lower temperature; however, oxygen is unlikely to persist at high temperatures, restricting aerobic respiration to mesophilic communities. Nitrite reduction to N2 has the highest energy yields at higher temperatures (greater than similar to 40 degrees C). Nitrate and nitrite reduction to ammonium also yield significant energy (up to -70 kJ/mol e-). Much lower, but still feasible energy yields are calculated for sulfate reduction, disproportionation, and reduction with H2. Organic compound family and the activity of methanethiol and dimethylsulfide were less important than metabolic strategy in determining overall energy yields. All metabolic strategies considered were exergonic within some portion of the mixing regime suggesting that organic sulfur-based metabolisms may be prevalent within deep-sea hydrothermal vent microbial communities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据