4.4 Article

CaCO3 nucleation by cyanobacteria: laboratory evidence for a passive, surface-induced mechanism

期刊

GEOBIOLOGY
卷 7, 期 3, 页码 324-347

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-4669.2009.00200.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. ETH Zurich [TH 0-20967-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Calcite nucleation on the surface of cyanobacteria of the Synechococcus leopoliensis strain PCC 7942 was investigated to assess the influence of photosynthetic uptake of inorganic carbon and active ion exchange processes across the cell membrane on the nucleation and precipitation mechanisms. We performed longterm precipitation experiments at a constant CO2 level in ambient air by adding suspensions of previously washed cyanobacteria to solutions of NaHCO3/CaCl2 which were supersaturated with respect to calcite. Induction times between 4 and 110 h were measured over a range of saturation states, W, between 8 and 4. The kinetics of CaCO3 nucleation was compared between experiments: (i) with ongoing photosynthesis, (ii) with cells metabolizing but not undergoing photosynthetic uptake of inorganic carbon and (iii) in darkness without photosynthesis. No significant differences were observed between the three treatments. The results reveal that under low nutrient concentrations and permanent CO2 supply, photosynthetic uptake of inorganic carbon predominantly uses CO2 and consequently does not directly influence the nucleation process of CaCO3 at the surface of S. leopoliensis. Furthermore, ion exchange processes did not affect the kinetics, indicating a passive nucleation process wherein the cell surface or extracellular polymers provided preferential sites for mineral nucleation. The catalyzing effect of the cyanobacteria on calcite nucleation was equivalent to a similar to 18% reduction in the specific interfacial free energy of the calcite nuclei. This result and the ubiquitous abundance of cyanobacteria suggest that this process may have an impact on local and global carbon cycling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据