4.7 Article

Temporal profiling of cytokine-induced genes in pancreatic β-cells by meta-analysis and network inference

期刊

GENOMICS
卷 103, 期 4, 页码 264-275

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2013.12.007

关键词

Diabetes; Pancreatic beta cells; Cytokines; Gene expression; Meta-analysis; Time series; Network inference

资金

  1. Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique (FNRS) Belgium
  2. Expert Center from the Dutch Diabetes Research Foundation [2008.40.001]
  3. European Union
  4. Swedish national strategic research initiative EXODIAB (Excellence Of Diabetes Research in Sweden)
  5. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation (JDRF) [31-2008-413, 4-2001-438, 42008-376]
  6. ECIT Islet for Basic Research Program
  7. Danish Council for Strategic Research [09-067036/DSF]
  8. Communaute Francaise de Belgique - Actions de Recherche Concertees (ARC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Type I Diabetes (T1D) is an autoimmune disease where local release of cytokines such as IL-1 beta and IFN-gamma contributes to beta-cell apoptosis. To identify relevant genes regulating this process we performed a meta-analysis of 8 datasets of beta-cell gene expression after exposure to IL-1 beta and IFN-gamma. Two of these datasets are novel and contain time-series expressions in human islet cells and rat INS-1E cells. Genes were ranked according to their differential expression within and after 24 h from exposure, and characterized by function and prior knowledge in the literature. A regulatory network was then inferred from the human time expression datasets, using a time-series extension of a network inference method. The two most differentially expressed genes previously unknown in T1D literature (RIPK2 and ELF3) were found to modulate cytokine-induced apoptosis. The inferred regulatory network is thus supported by the experimental validation, providing a proof-of-concept for the proposed statistical inference approach. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据