4.7 Article

Design and analysis issues in genome-wide somatic mutation studies of cancer

期刊

GENOMICS
卷 93, 期 1, 页码 17-21

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2008.07.005

关键词

Mutation analysis; Cancer genomics

资金

  1. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P50CA062924, R37CA043460, R01CA121113, R37CA057345] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. Howard Hughes Medical Institute Funding Source: Medline
  3. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA121113-04, R01 CA121113, P50 CA062924, P50 CA062924-080010, R37 CA057345-18, R37 CA057345, R37 CA057345-17, R37 CA043460-26, P50 CA062924-150012, R37 CA043460] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The availability of the human genome sequence and progress in sequencing and bioinformatic technologies have enabled genome-wide investigation of somatic mutations in human cancers. This article briefly reviews challenges arising in the statistical analysis of mutational data of this kind. A first challenge is that of designing studies that efficiently allocate sequencing resources. We show that this can be addressed by two-stage designs and demonstrate via simulations that wen relatively small studies can produce lists of candidate cancer genes that are highly informative for future research efforts. A second challenge is to distinguish mutated genes that are selected for by cancer (drivers) from mutated genes that have no role in the development of cancer and simply happened to mutate (passengers). We suggest that this question is best approached as a classification problem and discuss some of the difficulties of more traditional testing-based approaches. A third challenge is to identify biologic processes affected by the driver genes. This can be pursued by gene set analyses. These can reliably identify functional groups and pathways that are enriched for mutated genes even when the individual genes involved in those pathways or sets are not mutated at sufficient frequencies to provide conclusive evidence as drivers. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据