4.7 Article

Maximum-likelihood estimation of recent shared ancestry (ERSA)

期刊

GENOME RESEARCH
卷 21, 期 5, 页码 768-774

出版社

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/gr.115972.110

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [GM-59290]
  2. Sorenson Molecular Genealogy Foundation
  3. University of Luxembourg - Institute for Systems Biology
  4. Primary Children's Medical Center Foundation National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [DK069513]
  5. National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health [K99HG005846]
  6. Huntsman Cancer Foundation
  7. Utah Population Database
  8. Utah Cancer Registry
  9. University of Utah
  10. Huntsman Cancer Institute
  11. NCI [N01-PC-35141]
  12. Utah State Department of Health
  13. [P01-CA073992]
  14. [R01-CA040641]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accurate estimation of recent shared ancestry is important for genetics, evolution, medicine, conservation biology, and forensics. Established methods estimate kinship accurately for first-degree through third-degree relatives. We demonstrate that chromosomal segments shared by two individuals due to identity by descent (IBD) provide much additional information about shared ancestry. We developed a maximum-likelihood method for the estimation of recent shared ancestry (ERSA) from the number and lengths of IBD segments derived from high-density SNP or whole-genome sequence data. We used ERSA to estimate relationships from SNP genotypes in 169 individuals from three large, well-defined human pedigrees. ERSA is accurate to within one degree of relationship for 97% of first-degree through fifth-degree relatives and 80% of sixth-degree and seventh-degree relatives. We demonstrate that ERSA's statistical power approaches the maximum theoretical limit imposed by the fact that distant relatives frequently share no DNA through a common ancestor. ERSA greatly expands the range of relationships that can be estimated from genetic data and is implemented in a freely available software package.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据