4.7 Article

Deep RNA sequencing at single base-pair resolution reveals high complexity of the rice transcriptome

期刊

GENOME RESEARCH
卷 20, 期 5, 页码 646-654

出版社

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/gr.100677.109

关键词

-

资金

  1. Chinese Academy of Science [KSCX2-YWN-023, GJHZ0701-6]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30725008]
  3. Chinese 973 program [2007CB815701, 2007CB815703, 2007CB815705]
  4. Shenzhen Municipal Government
  5. Yantian District local government of Shenzhen
  6. Danish Platform for Integrative Biology
  7. Danish Natural Science Research Council [272-07-0196]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the dynamics of eukaryotic transcriptome is essential for studying the complexity of transcriptional regulation and its impact on phenotype. However, comprehensive studies of transcriptomes at single base resolution are rare, even for modern organisms, and lacking for rice. Here, we present the first transcriptome atlas for eight organs of cultivated rice. Using high-throughput paired-end RNA-seq, we unambiguously detected transcripts expressing at an extremely low level, as well as a substantial number of novel transcripts, exons, and untranslated regions. An analysis of alternative splicing in the rice transcriptome revealed that alternative cis-splicing occurred in similar to 33% of all rice genes. This is far more than previously reported. In addition, we also identified 234 putative chimeric transcripts that seem to be produced by trans-splicing, indicating that transcript fusion events are more common than expected. In-depth analysis revealed a multitude of fusion transcripts that might be by-products of alternative splicing. Validation and chimeric transcript structural analysis provided evidence that some of these transcripts are likely to be functional in the cell. Taken together, our data provide extensive evidence that transcriptional regulation in rice is vastly more complex than previously believed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据