4.7 Article

Very small mobile repeated elements in cyanobacterial genomes

期刊

GENOME RESEARCH
卷 18, 期 9, 页码 1484-1499

出版社

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/gr.074336.107

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation
  2. Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
  3. Swedish Research Council
  4. Franz, Inc

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mobile DNA elements play a major role in genome plasticity and other evolutionary processes, an insight gained primarily through the study of transposons and retrotransposons (generally similar to 1000 nt or longer). These elements spawn smaller parasitic versions (generally > 100 nt) that propagate through proteins encoded by the full elements. Highly repeated sequences smaller than 100 nt have been described, but they are either nonmobile or their origins are not known. We have surveyed the genome of the multicellular cyanobacterium, Nostoc punctiforme, and its relatives for small dispersed repeat (SDR) sequences and have identified eight families in the range of from 21 to 27 nucleotides. Three of the families (SDR4, SDR5, and SDR6), despite little sequence similarity, share a common predicted secondary structure, a conclusion supported by patterns of compensatory mutations. The SDR elements are found in a diverse set of contexts, often embedded within tandemly repeated heptameric sequences or within minitransposons. One element ( SDR5) is found exclusively within instances of an octamer, HIP1, that is highly over-represented in the genomes of many cyanobacteria. Two elements (SDR1 and SDR4) often are found within copies of themselves, producing complex nested insertions. An analysis of SDR elements within cyanobacterial genomes indicate that they are essentially confined to a coherent subgroup. The evidence indicates that some of the SDR elements, probably working through RNA intermediates, have been mobile in recent evolutionary time, making them perhaps the smallest known mobile elements.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据