4.5 Article

Evolutionary Rate Heterogeneity of Core and Attachment Proteins in Yeast Protein Complexes

期刊

GENOME BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
卷 5, 期 7, 页码 1366-1375

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evt096

关键词

core protein; attachment protein; evolutionary rate; yeast; protein complex; protein complex number

资金

  1. Department of Biotechnology, Government of India
  2. Department of Science and Technology, Government of India [BT/PR692/BID/7/369/2011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In general, proteins do not work alone; they form macromolecular complexes to play fundamental roles in diverse cellular functions. On the basis of their iterative clustering procedure and frequency of occurrence in the macromolecular complexes, the protein subunits have been categorized as core and attachment. Core protein subunits are the main functional elements, whereas attachment proteins act as modifiers or activators in protein complexes. In this article, using the current data set of yeast protein complexes, we found that core proteins are evolving at a faster rate than attachment proteins in spite of their functional importance. Interestingly, our investigation revealed that attachment proteins are present in a higher number of macromolecular complexes than core proteins. We also observed that the protein complex number (defined as the number of protein complexes in which a protein subunit belongs) has a stronger influence on gene/protein essentiality than multifunctionality. Finally, our results suggest that the observed differences in the rates of protein evolution between core and attachment proteins are due to differences in protein complex number and expression level. Moreover, we conclude that proteins which are present in higher numbers of macromolecular complexes enhance their overall expression level by increasing their transcription rate as well as translation rate, and thus the protein complex number imposes a strong selection pressure on the evolution of yeast proteome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据