期刊
GENOME BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
卷 5, 期 3, 页码 578-590出版社
OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evt028
关键词
junk DNA; genome functionality; selection; ENCODE project
资金
- NIH [T32MH014592]
- NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [T32MH014592] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
A recent slew of ENCyclopedia Of DNA Elements (ENCODE) Consortium publications, specifically the article signed by all Consortium members, put forward the idea that more than 80% of the human genome is functional. This claim flies in the face of current estimates according to which the fraction of the genome that is evolutionarily conserved through purifying selection is less than 10%. Thus, according to the ENCODE Consortium, a biological function can be maintained indefinitely without selection, which implies that at least 80 - 10 = 70% of the genome is perfectly invulnerable to deleterious mutations, either because no mutation can ever occur in these functional regions or because no mutation in these regions can ever be deleterious. This absurd conclusion was reached through various means, chiefly by employing the seldom used causal role definition of biological function and then applying it inconsistently to different biochemical properties, by committing a logical fallacy known as affirming the consequent, by failing to appreciate the crucial difference between junk DNA and garbage DNA, by using analytical methods that yield biased errors and inflate estimates of functionality, by favoring statistical sensitivity over specificity, and by emphasizing statistical significance rather than the magnitude of the effect. Here, we detail the many logical and methodological transgressions involved in assigning functionality to almost every nucleotide in the human genome. The ENCODE results were predicted by one of its authors to necessitate the rewriting of textbooks. We agree, many textbooks dealing with marketing, mass-media hype, and public relations may well have to be rewritten.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据