4.4 Article

Visfatin-948G/T and resistin-420C/G polymorphisms in Egyptian type 2 diabetic patients with and without cardiovascular diseases

期刊

GENOME
卷 57, 期 5, 页码 259-266

出版社

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING, NRC RESEARCH PRESS
DOI: 10.1139/gen-2014-0022

关键词

type 2 diabetes mellitus; cardiovascular disease; NAMPT-948G/T; RETN-420C/G; polymorphisms

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diabetes mellitus is one of the main threats to human health in the 21st century. Visfatin/Nampt and resistin are novel adipokines that have been implicated in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) complication. Several genetic studies have shown inconsistent results regarding association of visfatin/Nampt gene (NAMPT) and resistin gene (RETN) polymorphisms with T2DM and CVD complications. Here, we investigate whether NAMPT -948G/T and RETN -420C/G polymorphisms are associated with T2DM, its CVD complications, and serum adipokines levels in 90 Egyptian diabetic patients (44 without CVD and 46 with CVD) along with 60 healthy control subjects. Higher frequencies of NAMPT -948G/G and RETN -420G/G were observed among T2DM patients compared with controls. Furthermore, the frequencies of these genotypes were significantly higher in T2DM patients with CVD than those without CVD. Both NAMPT -948G/G and RETN -420G/G genotypes and G alleles were significantly associated with T2DM and CVD in Egyptian diabetic patients. Moreover, serum visfatin/Nampt and resistin levels were markedly elevated in T2DM patients, with the highest values observed in G/G genotypes among T2DM patients with CVD. In addition, positive correlations were observed between plasma adipokines levels and CVD risk factors. In conclusion, our data suggests that genetic variations in NAMPT -948G/T and RETN -420C/G may contribute to the disposition for T2DM and its CVD complications in Egyptian patients. However, further studies with greater sample size should be performed to verify these results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据