4.6 Article

Connexin-26-associated deafness: Phenotypic variability and progression of hearing loss

期刊

GENETICS IN MEDICINE
卷 12, 期 3, 页码 174-181

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181d0d42b

关键词

connexin 26; genotype-phenotype correlation; hearing loss; audiology; congenital deafness

资金

  1. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
  2. Department of Pathology at Stanford University Hospital and Clinics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To evaluate genotype-phenotype correlation over time for a cohort of children with connexin-26 (GJB2)-associated autosomal recessive hearing loss. Methods: Fifty-two children were identified from a database of individuals with homozygous or compound heterozygous mutations in GJB2 and subjected to chart review of their otolaryngologic and serial audiometric evaluations. Genotype-phenotype correlations were identified among the members of this group by appropriate statistical analyses. Results: Hearing loss was most severe in individuals with two truncating mutations in GJB2 and mildest in those with two nontruncating mutations. Progressive hearing loss was seen directly by serial audiometry in 24% of all subjects, and suggested in a total of 28% when those with normal newborn hearing screens and subsequent hearing loss were included. Progression was particularly common among carriers of the p. V37I allele either in homozygosity or in compound heterozygosity with a truncating allele; these children are primarily of Asian descent and demonstrate mild, slowly progressive hearing loss. Conclusions: Phenotype in GJB2-associated hearing loss is correlated with genotype, with truncating mutations giving rise to more severe hearing loss. Progression of hearing loss is not uncommon, especially in association with the p. V37I allele. These results suggest that close audiometric follow-up is warranted for patients with GJB2-associated recessive hearing loss. Genet Med 2010:12(3):174-181.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据