4.6 Article

Long-term, open-labeled extension study of idursulfase in the treatment of Hunter syndrome

期刊

GENETICS IN MEDICINE
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 95-101

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181fea459

关键词

Hunter syndrome; idursulfase; enzyme replacement therapy; clinical trial; lysosomal storage disease; mucopolysaccharidosis type II

资金

  1. Shire HGT
  2. Genzyme Corporation
  3. Biomarin
  4. National Center of Research Resources, National Institutes of Health [M01RR00046]
  5. National Center for Research Resources [5 M01 RR-01271]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: This study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of long-term enzyme replacement therapy with idursulfase (recombinant human iduronate-2-sulfatase) in patients with Hunter syndrome. Methods: All 94 patients who completed a 53-week double-blinded study of idursulfase enrolled in this open-labeled extension study and received intravenous idursulfase at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg weekly for 2 years, and clinical outcomes and safety were assessed. Results: No change in percent predicted forced vital capacity was seen, but absolute forced vital capacity demonstrated sustained improvement and was increased 25.1% at the end of the study. Statistically significant increases in 6-minute walking test distance were observed at most time points. Mean liver and spleen volumes remained reduced throughout the 2-year extension study. Mean joint range of motion improved for the shoulder and remained stable in other joints. Both the parent-and child-assessed Child Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index Score demonstrated significant improvement. Infusion-related adverse events occurred in 53% of patients and peaked at Month 3 of treatment and declined thereafter. Neutralizing IgG antibodies were detected in 23% of patients and seemed to attenuate the improvement in pulmonary function. Conclusions: Weekly infusions of idursulfase result in sustained clinical improvement during 3 years of treatment. Genet Med 2011:13(2):95-101.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据