4.6 Article

Ethnicity, sex, and the incidence of congenital heart defects: a report from the National Down Syndrome Project

期刊

GENETICS IN MEDICINE
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 173-180

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181634867

关键词

Down syndrome; trisomy 21; congenital heart defects; a trio ventricular septal defect; ethnicity; race; sex; gender; maternal age; ancestral informative markers

资金

  1. NCATS NIH HHS [UL1 TR000454] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCRR NIH HHS [M01 RR00039] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NICHD NIH HHS [F32 HD046337, R01 HD38979, P01 HD24605] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIGMS NIH HHS [T32 GM008490] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: The population-based National Down Syndrome Project combined epidemiological and molecular methods to study congenital heart defects in Down syndrome. Methods: Between 2000 and 2004, six sites collected DNA, clinical, and epidemiological information on parents and infants. We used logistic regression to examine factors associated with the most common Down syndrome-associated heart defects. Results: Of 1469 eligible infants, major cardiac defects were present in 44%; atrioventricular septal defect (39%), secundum atrial septal defect (42%), ventricular septal defect (43%), and tetralogy of Fallot (6%). Atrioventricular septal defects showed the most significant sex and ethnic differences with twice as many affected females (odds ratio, 1.93; 95% confidence interval, 1.40-2.6-17) and, compared with whites, twice as many blacks (odds ratio, 2.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-3.21) and half as many Hispanics (odds ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.300.77). No associations were found with origin of the nondisjunction error or with the presence of gastrointestinal defects. Conclusions: Sex and ethnic differences exist for atrioventricular septal defects in Down syndrome. Identification of genetic and environmental risk factors associated with these differences is essential to our understanding of the etiology of congenital heart defects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据