4.4 Article

Generation of high-titre virus stocks using BrK.219, a B-cell line infected stably with recombinant Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS
卷 217, 期 -, 页码 79-86

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2015.02.022

关键词

Kaposi's sarcoma; Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus; KSHV; human herpesvirus 8; BrK.219; high-titre virus stocks

资金

  1. Collaborative Research Centre 900 of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  2. European Union Integrated Project INCA [LSHC-CT-2005-018704]
  3. DZIF (German Centre for Infection Research)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) is a gamma-2-Iymphotropic human oncogenic herpesvirus associated with Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) and two B-cell lymphoproliferative diseases, primary effusion lymphoma (PEL) and multicentric Castleman's disease (MCD). KSHV establishes latency soon after infection in vivo and in vitro. Consequently, it is technically difficult to generate high-titre virus stocks required for infection experiments in tissue culture. Currently used methods of KSHV stock production involve induction of the lytic/productive cycle in PEL cell lines or in adherent cell lines harbouring recombinant KSHV genomes. In this study, the BJAB-derived B-cell line BrK.219, which is infected latently with a recombinant KSHV (rKSHV.219), is used to produce high-titre virus stocks. BrK.219 cells enter the lytic KSHV replication cycle upon cross-linking of B-cell receptors (BCRs) with anti-IgM antibodies without the need for additional, potentially toxic chemical inducers. High cell concentrations can be cultured and induced easily in spinner flasks, saving time and resources. The established protocol allows the generation of KSHV virus stocks with titres of up to 106 IU/ml in unconcentrated culture supernatants, representing a 103-104-fold improvement compared to conventional methods. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据