4.1 Article

Role of mitochondrial DNA variants and copy number in diabetic atherogenesis

期刊

GENETICS AND MOLECULAR RESEARCH
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 3339-3348

出版社

FUNPEC-EDITORA
DOI: 10.4238/2012.September.17.4

关键词

Mitochondrial DNA; Type 2 diabetes mellitus; Atherosclerosis

资金

  1. National Science Council, Executive Yuan (ROC) [NSC-98-2314-B-182A-017-MY2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hyperglycemia-induced reactive oxygen species production can cause diabetes and its complications, including atherosclerosis. The role of mitochondrial DNA variants and mitochondrial copy number in the pathogenesis of diabetic atherogenesis is not well understood. We examined 36 diabetic patients who had undergone amputation for diabetic foot and seven non-diabetic patients who had undergone amputation after traumatic injury. Mitochondrial DNA was extracted and used for sequencing. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) relative to the Cambridge reference sequence were analyzed. Mitochondrial DNA copy number was quantified by real-time PCR. Twenty-one novel variants were detected in 29 diabetic patients with arterial stenosis; six of the variants were heteroplasmic, and most occurred in highly evolutionarily conserved residues. These variants were more prevalent in patients with arterial stenosis than in those without stenosis. The novel variants included four in complex I (ND1: C3477A/C, A3523A/G; ND5: C13028A/C, C13060A/C), one in complex IV (COX1: T6090A/T), and one in rRNA (12srRNA: G857G/T). Compared with non-diabetic patients, the diabetic patients had significantly less mitochondrial DNA. Furthermore, among diabetic patients with arterial stenosis, there was a significant positive correlation between mitochondrial DNA copy number and the number of total SNPs. In conclusion, we identified six novel heteroplasmic mitochondrial DNA variants among diabetic patients with arterial stenosis, and we found that diabetic atherogenesis is associated with decreased amounts of mitochondrial DNA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据